This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dark_deleuze_andrew_culp [2022/12/09 09:32] alexz |
dark_deleuze_andrew_culp [2022/12/09 09:54] (current) alexz |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Notes on Dark Deleuze, Andrew Culp | + | Notes on [[https:// |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| + | (p. 69)\\ | ||
| + | The lesson to be taken is that “we all must live double lives”: one full of the compromises we make with the present, and the other in which we plot to undo them. The struggle is to keep one’s cover identity from taking over. There are those whose daily drudgery makes it difficult to contribute to the conspiracy, though people in this position are far more likely to have secret dealings on the side. Others are given ample opportunities but still fail to grow the secret, the most extreme example being those who live their lives “with nothing to hide,” often declaring that they are “an open book.” Some treat the conspiracy as a form of hobbyism, working to end the world only after everything else has been taken care of—the worst being liberal communists, who exploit so much in the morning that they can give half of it back as charity in the afternoon. And then there are those who escape. Crafting new weapons while withdrawing from the demands of the social, they know that cataclysm knows nothing of the productivist logic of accumulation or reproduction. Escape need not be dreary, even if they are negative. Escape is never more exciting than when it spills out into the streets, where trust in appearances, | ||